MUST SEE RUGER VIDEO
******************************************************
FOR COMPLETE MAKAROV ARTICLE GO TO
http://actionsbyt.typepad.com/actionsbyt/2008/02/makarov-article.html
********************************************
NEW GUNSMITH FORUM
http://thegunsmiths.com/phpBB2/
********************************************
www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com
www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com
www.handgunpartsforsale.blogspot.com
www.hipowersandhandguns.comhttp://www.spw-duf.info/links.html#guns
***********************************************************
Corbon .38 Special 110-gr. DPX Ammunition
Tested in 3 Different Barrel Lengths
In recent years, a hue and cry for expanding ammunition that doesn't fragment and penetrates at least 12" in 10% ballistic gelatin has been the new beat to which high-performance ammo makers have been marching.
From Remington, we see the Golden Saber while Speer has the bonded Gold Dot line of hollow points. Winchester's law enforcement Ranger SXT line represents yet another entry as does Federal's new bonded version of the old Hydrashok.
Corbon, a maker of fast, aggressive expanding ammunition, continues with the type loads that made it famous, but has also been exploring other possibilities. First came their PowRball, a +P round in several calibers that expands massively and penetrates a bit moreDeep Penetrating X (bullet). I have seen the X bullet used with great success in rifle calibers. than the Sierra Power Jacket Hollow Points used in their traditional defensive line of ammunition. Corbon has the manufacturing rights to a relatively new bullet. It is a copper hollow point "X bullet" made by Barnes. Corbon calls this new load "DPX" for
The copper bullet used in the DPX ammo is homogeneous; in other words there is no jacket to possibly separate from the core. Copper is more malleable than typical gilding metal and less likely to break off during expansion. The copper content on the very well respected Winchester Ranger line of JHP's has a higher copper content than normal for jacketed hollow points.
Corbon offers the DPX for the .38 Special. What' more is that it is offered in a standardpressure load! The bullet has a longish profile and weighs 110 grains.
This is the 110-gr. DPX standard pressure load. It is advertised at 1200 ft/sec. A crimp is evident on the case mouth and there were no bullets that worked loose from recoil during firing.
Examining the .38 DPX cartridge, I noticed that the virgin cases are from Remington and are so head stamped.
The Corbon DPX .38 Special cases are from Remington. The hollow point is massive and approximately 0.135" wide and 0.335" deep. The cartridge is longer than most 110-gr. JHP's. Copper is not as dense/heavy as lead so the bullet must be longer for the same weight.
Corbon wisely chose to offer a .38 Special round in standard pressure. Lots of +P ammunition exists for the caliber, but in light guns, some people just don't care for the snappier recoil. Others don't wish to use high-pressure ammunition in their standard-pressure-rated revolvers.
It's probably a safe bet that the majority of .38 Special revolvers being used for defense are snubs in the role of either primary or secondary weapons. For that reason, I used a 1 7/8" S&W for checking velocities, expansion, and accuracy. I then recalled that more than a few folks have mentioned liking their 3" .38's and .357's, so they might be interested in how this load might perform from their guns. Since 4" guns do defense duty in more than a few households, testing really needed to be included for that barrel length, too!
Corbon's 110-gr. DPX was fired from three Smith & Wesson .38 Special revolvers. The snub was a Model 638. The 3" used was a Model 64 and a 4" Model 10 rounded out the trio.
These three S&W's were used to test the 110-gr. DPX.
Ten shots were fired approximately ten feet from the chronograph screen for the average velocities provided in the following table. Velocities, extreme spreads, and standard deviations are in feet per second.
Corbon .38 Special Chronograph Data:
| Gun: | Bbl. (in.): | Low: | High: | Average: | Extreme Spread: | Std. Deviation: |
| S&W M638 | 1 7/8 | 1005 | 1045 | 1077 | 40 | 16 |
| S&W M64 | 3 | 1073 | 1157 | 1118 | 84 | 27 |
| S&WM10 | 4 | 1088 | 1160 | 1122 | 72 | 25 |
It is interesting to note that in these particular revolvers, the ammunition performed mostshortest barrel! Notice also that the velocity differences (average as well as high and low) are practically identical for the 3 and 4" guns. None hit the 1200 ft/sec mark, but out of the longer barrels, they were in the ballpark. consistently in the
No apparent signs of excessive pressure can be seen on this fired case or primer. I could literally shake the empties from any of the revolvers without using the extractor rod.
Most defensive scenarios for private citizens are measured in feet or inches rather than yards. Nevertheless, I decided to shoot a slow-fire, double-action group at 10 yards with the Model 638.
This group fired with the snub consists of two cylinder's worth of ammunition or ten shots. Notice that at both 7 and 9 O' clock the bullets hit the target at an angle. I fired another group of five shots using a Model 642 and this did not occur.
Six shots were fired single-action at 15 yards using the 3" Model 64. There was no evidence of key holing and the group is more than satisfactory in size for self-protection needs. Most of us cannot shoot groups of this size at speed and under stress. Groups fired with the 4" Model 10 were practically identical. I did not shoot this ammunition farther than 15 yards today.
Recoil felt considerably less than with my usual carry load, Remington 158-gr. LSWCHP +P. Out of the same gun, the 110-gr. DPX shows to average between 6 and 7% less; it felt like the recoil was considerably less than the figures indicate. Someone sensitive to recoil might very well appreciate this load.
On the left is the front view of the Remington 158-gr. LSWCHP +P compared to the 110-gr. DPX. The former is my usual "carry load" in the snubs, but recoil is sharp and many do not find it pleasant. Felt recoil is subjective but to me, the DPX felt recoil is much less than the 6% reduction it shows on paper.
Recoil from the Airweight J-frame was the "greatest" of the three, but it was not bad at all. I think even a new shooter would have no problem with it. Out of the heavier all-steel guns, it was pleasant.
Corbon advertises that the DPX should meet or exceed the 12" depth desired by many when fired into ballistic gelatin whether bare or passing through 4 layers of denim. I fired several of the rounds from each gun into water.
Here's what I got:
Most of the rounds looked like the "best examples" shown on the left. The single "worst example" is shown at the bottom right. It partially expanded and its recovered dimensions are 0.48 x 0.44". Most of the time recovered bullets averaged 0.67" across and were very uniform. They were also about 0.51" tall. The bullets lost essentially no weight. I didn't pull the bullets and weigh them before firing, but the recovered weights were never lower than 108 grains. Most were right at 109.
The two sideways hits on the J-frame's target were disappointing, but may be peculiar to that particular revolver. It did not happen at all with a different snub I happened to have in my pocket nor was it seen from either the 3 or 4" guns.
I see this standard pressure load as an option for those wanting a lower recoiling lightweight snub defensive load that offers both expansion and penetration. With Federal's 125-gr. standard pressure Nyclad hollow point no longer being available to the general public, DPX might be a viable option. It does offer a few more inches of penetration than the 8 to 10" generally reported from those doing ballistic gelatin tests.
This Federal 125-gr. standard velocity Nyclad hollow point was fired into water from a 4" barrel at an average velocity of 938 ft/sec. Its recovered diameter is 0.42 x 0.49 x 0.54" tall.
Here is the expanded 125-gr. Nyclad hollow point fired from a 4" barrel flanked by an expanded DPX (left) and the "worst" one in today's test (right). The two DPX loads were fired from a 1 7/8" barrel.
I am not privy to the engineering details at Corbon concerning the DPX, but I think if the bullet can be made a tiny bit shorter, the key holing problem will disappear. It is not an issue at all in barrels longer than 1 7/8".
The expanded petals are tough and have sharp edges but soft enough not to be brittle. The longer overall length of the bullet contributes to its ability to penetrate deeper than if it flattened out more. So does having the gaps between the petals. This lessens the "parachute" effect of the solid wide mushroom, but still damages tissue effectively.
The pointed profile of the Corbon DPX made the use of a speed loader a snap. Under stress, finding the relatively large revolver chambers should be easier for shaking fingers with the smaller diameter meplat of this bullet.
Whether by choice, official mandate, or other circumstances, the snub .38 is sometimes the choice for defending life or property. Is it the best? No, probably not, but it has the advantage of being there when needed due to its compact size and light weight.
If you or someone you know uses the .38 for "serious" purposes but have issues with recoil, this load might be worth a hard look. If you cannot or will not use +P in your revolver, this might be worth a try. Will it be replacing my usual +P carry load in my snub? The jury is out on that one. I want to see problems with stabilization have eliminated in the ammo or know that they were specific to my revolver. In a 3 or 4" barrel, I'd have no qualms about using this ammunition right now.
************************************************************************************
Is John McCain Ineligible to Be President? | ||
| ||
Pundits are now writing obituaries . John McCain's sinking campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.
I hereby join them with a fundamental question: Does the Arizona senator fulfill our Constitution's eligibility requirements to be president?
Like several other prominent American politicians, John McCain was not born in the United States.
Article II of the Constitution specifies that "no person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Because of this, California's Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, born in Austria in 1947, is ineligible to be president. He moved to the United States in 1968 and became a U.S. citizen in 1983.
Because of this, Michigan's Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm, born in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1959, is ineligible to become president. She moved at age 4 with her family to Hollywood and failed at acting before entering politics. Granholm became a U.S. citizen in 1980.
Questions arose about another Michigan governor in 1968 when George Romney, father of current GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney, sought the Republican nomination.
George Romney was born in Chihuahua, Mexico, where his Mormon father had fled in 1886 with his three wives after the U.S. government outlawed polygamy — what the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints had previously called "plural marriage."
The Romney family went to Mexico but never gave up their U.S. citizenship. On the eve of Mexican revolution in 1912, they returned to the United States. At age 32, George Romney settled in Michigan in 1939.
Democratic political foes later nicknamed Romney "Chihuahua George," but the general consensus was that he was eligible to seek the presidency.
The first Congress of the United States on March 26, 1790, had passed legislation that said: "The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens of the United States."
Most of us could infer that this opinion during the era of America's founding settles the question of whether citizen-sired children like Romney are eligible to become president.
But this 1790 legislation was not the Constitution itself. A future U.S. Supreme Court ruling might reinterpret the vague language of our bedrock legal document otherwise.
This matters because, as mentioned earlier, Sen. McCain was not born in the United States.
John Sidney McCain III was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in Coco Solo in the Panama Canal Zone, where his U.S. Navy admiral father was serving our country.
Panama itself was created by the United States at the whim of Theodore Roosevelt, who backed rebel claims of Panamanian independence from Colombia. T.R. won agreement from the new nation of Panama to build the Panama Canal in a territory called the Panama Canal Zone, controlled by the U.S. from 1903 until 1979, when Democratic President Jimmy Carter surrendered it.
The place John McCain was born was controlled by the U.S. in 1936 but is no longer American controlled today.
Nobody disputes that John McCain was from birth a United States citizen.
And most of us agree that it would be unfair to deny presidential eligibility to patriotic citizens born to parents serving overseas in the U.S. military. Such people are likely to be among the most patriotic and worthy of Americans.
But the Constitutionally-mandated term "natural born citizen" remains subject to reinterpretation by future Supreme Courts.
And, frankly, there is much that seems unnatural and un-American about Sen. John McCain.
Why has he been so eager to extend rights and a path to citizenship to millions of illegal aliens in ways that would benefit the Democratic Party?
Why did he push the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, a measure that manifestly gags freedom of political speech and, again, benefits the Democratic Party?
Why as a nominal Republican has he spoken and voted so often against cutting taxes?
More than any other recent presidential candidate, McCain is a genuine war hero who suffered torture as a prisoner of war in the Hanoi Hilton.
But his odd political positions leave many with a suspicion that this experience turned him into a Manchurian Candidate, secretly programmed by the enemy in ways even he might not understand to do their bidding by advancing the American left.
During his 2000 Presidential run, McCain was lionized by the liberal media as a "maverick," i.e., as someone who criticized and undermined conventional Republican positions.
McCain's campaign is foundering today for two reasons.
He has taken positions too far left to win the hearts and minds of conservatives, who dislike and mistrust him. (Ironically, they prefer Fred Thompson, who as a U.S. senator from Tennessee was close to McCain and in the words of American Conservative Union head David Keene was "a chief water-carrier for McCain-Feingold.")
But of late McCain has staunchly supported the war in Iraq and moved right in other ways that alienated his former boosters in the liberal mainstream media. They therefore no longer find him a useful club with which to bash Republicans.
His flagging campaign, which reportedly has only $2 million on hand but has been burning money at the rate of $3 million per month, recently jettisoned half its staff.
McCain has a long and honorable family history as a warrior. He can remember at age 17, the year he entered the Naval Academy Annapolis, drinking a toast with Adm. Halsey to mark the naming of a destroyer for his grandfather. (The USS John S. McCain was sold for scrap in 1980.)
McCain might enjoy, even prefer, fighting for the presidency from his current position as underdog.
And in theory he could yet win — but his chances of a comeback grow slimmer with each passing day.
When federal authorities were unable to convict gangster Al Capone of other crimes, they jailed him for tax evasion.
For the safety of America, John McCain should never be president. If stopping him requires invoking the petty technicality of his Panama Canal Zone birth, then let it be so.
© 2007 NewsMax. All rights reserved. ....................................................................................................................................................................... | ||
DO NOT DISTURB = ANOTHER ISLAMIC FIGHTER IS IN PARADISE WITH HIS REWARD OF 72 VIRGINS.
